Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Dansby Signing With Bengals
#34
(03-30-2016, 01:44 PM)leonardfan40 Wrote: Lamur is gone, Dansby will take his spot. Hawk still is solid against the run which is why we brought him in so he will still have a place on the team. People saying he made no contribution are probably those that had WAY to high of expectations for him last season, people who knew what he was will think he performed just fine. I'm sure the bengals expected about what they got from hawk so I doubt they just cut him because we signed a different type of player in dansby. Give me dansby on passing downs at SAM and hawk on running plays and we'll be just fine

I might fall into that category of having too high of expectations for Hawk.

He isn't bad in coverage either. Who knows, he might still make the team, i am all for the best players making it.

Flowers impressed me last Preseason, can run, tackle and cover. Just needs to stay healthy.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Dansby Signing With Bengals - MrRager - 03-29-2016, 02:02 PM
RE: Dansby Signing With Bengals - SFmajor - 03-29-2016, 10:32 PM
RE: Dansby Signing With Bengals - SFmajor - 03-29-2016, 06:32 PM
RE: Dansby Signing With Bengals - SFmajor - 03-29-2016, 10:28 PM
RE: Dansby Signing With Bengals - SFmajor - 03-29-2016, 10:42 PM
RE: Dansby Signing With Bengals - SFmajor - 03-29-2016, 10:49 PM
RE: Dansby Signing With Bengals - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 03-30-2016, 02:04 PM
RE: Dansby Signing With Bengals - Sled21 - 03-30-2016, 04:11 PM
RE: Dansby Signing With Bengals - Sled21 - 03-31-2016, 06:07 PM
RE: Dansby Signing With Bengals - Brodude3 - 03-30-2016, 07:15 PM
RE: Dansby Signing With Bengals - Joelist - 03-31-2016, 06:27 PM
RE: Dansby Signing With Bengals - Sled21 - 03-31-2016, 09:41 PM
RE: Dansby Signing With Bengals - magikod - 04-01-2016, 02:28 PM
RE: Dansby Signing With Bengals - SFmajor - 04-02-2016, 09:56 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)