06-23-2015, 01:44 PM
(06-23-2015, 01:03 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: This argument is so silly.
Shake the term "Arguing for the sake of arguing" comes to mind on half of his posts. It's a button pusher thing. If you said what he did, then his reply would be the complete opposite point of view. :snark:
"If the most important thing is the financials' and the second most important thing is winning, then you don't have a chance. It's so important for ownership to do what it takes to win"
