04-05-2016, 09:45 PM
(04-05-2016, 09:41 PM)Okeana Wrote: How exactly can you establish consistency off two points of reference ? I feel like your trying to argue a point, but not clearly stating an opinion. Is this because I stated that Zeke would be worthy of a first round with our 24th pick and you feel its better spent on a position of greater need ? I really don't understand your statement between me hating on hill and me hating on Gio? So If I have an issue with one running back I must hate on all running backs ? Shrug thanks for your input.
Okay. Let me try again just using small words and simple sentences.
Jeremy Hill had a great rookie season but slumped his second year.
Giovani Bernard had a great rookie season but slumped his second year.
You claim that Hill is overrated because of his good rookie season, but you never claimed that Gio was overrated because of his good rookie season.
Since you took opposite positions under the same fact pattern you are not being logically consistent.
