06-24-2015, 05:45 AM
(06-24-2015, 03:36 AM)CornerBlitz Wrote: The only reason it gets "ugly" is because of the people that cannot get themselves to admit things that are clear to everyone outside of Cincinnati.
The QB is not very good.
The head coach is not very good.
If everyone would agree to the above 2 statements u'd get a lot less ugliness on these forums. The people that have been defending Dalton can't get themselves to admit the 1st one, and the homers that defend the Bengals at all costs can't get themselves to admit either. It's actually united some people that would never agree on anything...Dalton Defenders unite with Bengals homers.
The ones that are left are the folks that don't have a stake in the game and have been looking at the team and QB through an objective lens.
Hold the press.
Did you or did you not chastise another poster for suggesting that the majority of blame for the teams postseason lack of success lies with the head coach?
Then here we go again..........if you do not completely agree with CB then you are not objective.
Andy has not shined in the postseason. However, to state he is not very good is not accurate either. He has been the QB for a team that has amassed 40 regular season wins in 4 seasons and please do not even start the ignorant winning in spite of. He has been the QB of a team that have won against the greats like Manning, Brees, Rodgers, and Brady.
Does he need to show more consistency? Yes he absolutely does. Does he need to show an ability to shine in the postseason to remain the starting QB? Yes he does.
