Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Hypothetical trade scenario
#3
(04-15-2016, 11:00 AM)fredtoast Wrote: 1.  I don't see that trade changing anything for us.  All the QB desperate teams are still drafting before us, just like before the trade.

2.  I would usually not be in favor of giving up a 4th round pick just to move up 2 spots.  I am guessing that there won't be much difference between a WR available at 22 and one available at 24.

1. Prior to the trade, a decent number of "experts" were projecting the Rams to actually draft a WR since they were sitting in an odd spot for taking a QB. And then they had Rams taking a QB in the second round.
But now, with jumping up to #1, it definitely means the Rams will take a QB (reportedly leaning Goff), which should (likely) reduce the number of WRs taken prior to #24.

2. I'm with you. No need to give up a 4th rounder to move up two spots, as the talent is near equal (just slightly different pros/cons). Instead, it would probably be better to trade back to 30-40 to get an extra mid-round pick and still get a receiver of comparable talent.
Zac Taylor 2019-2020: 6 total wins
Zac Taylor 2021-2022: Double-digit wins each season, plus 5 postseason wins
Zac Taylor 2023: 9 wins despite losing Burrow half the season
Zac Taylor 2024: Started 1-4. If he can turn this into a playoff appearance, it will be impressive.

Sorry for Party Rocking!

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Hypothetical trade scenario - CJD - 04-15-2016, 10:08 AM
RE: Hypothetical trade scenario - ochocincos - 04-15-2016, 11:52 AM
RE: Hypothetical trade scenario - Au165 - 04-18-2016, 11:24 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)