04-15-2016, 06:40 PM
(04-15-2016, 06:21 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: So you admit there was no big change with Mathis under Paul Alexander and you don't deny he played much better under Howard Mudd almost immediately; but somehow coaching had nothing to do with his evaluation development even though you claim evaluation and development are a part of coaching?
Correct. Even the best coaches can not get production from a player who will not get in shape.
See: Bill Belichick and Albert Haynesworth. I can find many other examples if you want, but that one proves my point pretty well.