04-17-2016, 02:24 PM
(04-17-2016, 11:42 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Funny how folks kinda gloss over missing 13 games in 3 years. There is no doubt that Charles has had a terrific career, but he is quickly closing in on 30 and may be at the end of his career. Gio is the better option at this time.
For the second time, this is not a post about who is a better option at this time. This is a thread/conversation is about the past.
(04-17-2016, 11:54 AM)Essex Johnson Wrote: I was comparing after three overall seasons.... and lets give Gio credit also.. if he would average the 1,147 he has averaged for the past three years in overall yards for 8 seasons he would have 9,176 which would be double what Woodhead has averaged in 8 seasons so far.
I don;t think it is out of the realm that in 8 years Gio is just below the level of Charles.. I feel that is what he is after 3 years when you compare the two... also injuries are part of a reflection and evaluation of a career... Charles has been hurt by that so if Gio stays healthy and continues to put up 1,200 seasons he will have a very good career.
You're arguing for just only accumulation while everyone else is factoring in dominance as well. Saying Gio and Charles will have the same level of careers just because of accumulation numbers is like saying Jim Brown and Frank Gore will have the same levels of careers because Gore only has 272 less rushing yards.
Generally when you find yourself against me, Shake, and Fred all agreeing, you know there must really something to it. Lol
____________________________________________________________
The 2021 season Super Bowl was over 1,000 days ago.
