04-17-2016, 08:51 PM
(04-17-2016, 02:24 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: For the second time, this is not a post about who is a better option at this time. This is a thread/conversation is about the past.
You're arguing for just only accumulation while everyone else is factoring in dominance as well. Saying Gio and Charles will have the same level of careers just because of accumulation numbers is like saying Jim Brown and Frank Gore will have the same levels of careers because Gore only has 272 less rushing yards.
Generally when you find yourself against me, Shake, and Fred all agreeing, you know there must really something to it. Lol
Your funny.. trying to compare Charles to Brown.... just probably the greatest RB ever Charles is not even close to Brown to try a comparison.. ... As I stated Charles has had a very fine career which you seem to have looked past but if Gio continues on the level he is on, he will have a very good career himself... Are you implying the Gio if he has 10,000 total yards in his first 8 seasons the level of accumulation means very little ??
Finally I do believe Gio possesses the ability to have even better numbers so only time will tell but after three years he has established himself as a very good back and can get better..... Well I think I have bantered with you enough on this one.. Who Dey