MyBB Internal: One or more warnings occurred. Please contact your administrator for assistance.
Interesting Article Comparing 2016 Draft With 2012
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Interesting Article Comparing 2016 Draft With 2012
#1
Thought this was interesting. Is a 2nd or in the Bengals case 3rd or 4th WR worth a 1st Rd pick. The Bengals are notorious for not starting draft picks their 1st year. So the question is, at what position of need do you guys see a 1st Rd player starting? DT, nope, DE, nope C, nope, S, nope, CB, no again. What about LB? I know we have alot of bodies at that position but most are just that. But again I dont see the Bengals starting a rookie LB so what does it matter, is there really a position OF NEED if they wont even start, why not just take BPA. On a side note I do think Treadwell could be a day 1 starter but we know that A. he will be off the board or B. Lafell or Tate will be the #2 regardless. Thoughts.

http://www.cincyjungle.com/2016/4/15/11424090/2012-vs-2016-bengals-should-pass-on-a-wide-receiver-in-the-first-round
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Interesting Article Comparing 2016 Draft With 2012 - TKUHL - 04-22-2016, 08:07 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)