Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why does L.A. Get another team?
#22
(05-17-2016, 02:31 PM)JS-Steelerfan Wrote: Sorry I'm late to the party, but I just read this thread today, and I wanted to 1) affirm that the teams are correct and 2) suggest that the reason they don't feel right is that your timline is off.  The Raiders moved to Los Angeles (1982) and back to Oakland (1994, more than just a couple of years later) before the Rams moved to St. Louis (1996)

Your timeline is off also.  The first two of the Bengal's three wins in 1993 were against the LA teams and as a result, 2 years later LA didn't have a team.  Both teams announced they were leaving LA in the first half of '95 and opened their time in the new cities for the '95 season.

Okay, so they didn't really lose their teams due to the losses to the Bengals but I'm sure LA went from having 2 NFL teams to 0 in one offseason.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Why does L.A. Get another team? - Penn - 04-25-2016, 09:22 PM
RE: Why does L.A. Get another team? - J24 - 05-10-2016, 01:34 AM
RE: Why does L.A. Get another team? - Penn - 05-18-2016, 05:51 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)