Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tim Wright
#10
(05-27-2016, 12:18 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: So he had 389 more yards (average of 130 more per year) and 3 fewer TDs depite being a full-time starter, while Wright was stuck behind Gronk in '14 and barely played behind Ebron last year. 

Not exactly solid evidence that Daniels is superior right now, as Daniels would've been behind those players as well. I'd argue that Wright's rookie season was better than any of Daniels' recent seasons. Plus he's way younger. Plus he's been a better RZ threat and that's what we're looking to replace.

Not saying either is a perfect candidate, but I'd prefer Wright - if he's healthy. I wouldn't mind Daniels though. We're lucky that options this good are still available.

Who could expect a 2nd TE to do anything in NE's offense?

Age is of zero concern to me as I am happy with our future at TE. As you say we have options. Hell Chris Cooley is trying to come back.
[Image: bfine-guns2.png]

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Tim Wright - Shake n Blake - 05-26-2016, 10:08 PM
RE: Tim Wright - SunsetBengal - 05-26-2016, 10:12 PM
RE: Tim Wright - Shake n Blake - 05-26-2016, 10:45 PM
RE: Tim Wright - Shake n Blake - 05-26-2016, 10:51 PM
RE: Tim Wright - bfine32 - 05-27-2016, 01:01 AM
RE: Tim Wright - Shake n Blake - 05-27-2016, 12:18 PM
RE: Tim Wright - bfine32 - 05-27-2016, 01:18 PM
RE: Tim Wright - ochocincos - 05-27-2016, 02:52 PM
RE: Tim Wright - coachmcneil71 - 05-30-2016, 06:20 PM
RE: Tim Wright - Shake n Blake - 05-31-2016, 12:01 PM
RE: Tim Wright - XenoMorph - 05-31-2016, 01:16 PM
RE: Tim Wright - Shake n Blake - 05-31-2016, 01:42 PM
RE: Tim Wright - bfine32 - 05-31-2016, 06:31 PM
RE: Tim Wright - Shake n Blake - 05-31-2016, 07:14 PM
RE: Tim Wright - XenoMorph - 06-01-2016, 11:34 AM
RE: Tim Wright - Shake n Blake - 05-27-2016, 08:11 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)