05-29-2016, 10:12 PM
dude who picked a name that can't be quoted for some reason Wrote:1. I'm gonna keep this short because this thing could go round and round forever.
2. I'm sure he did. Thanks.
3. It's highly unlikely to come ,because the Bengals have too much invested in Dalton and there is no way that they will bench him just because the young backup has a promising look about him. 4. Also once again, I didn't say Mccarron is superior to Dalton. I said he could be if given the opportunity. Write that down and pin it to your refrigerator so I don't have to remind you again. I also never said he had "immense potential", I merely said he could become equal to or greater than Dalton. I also didn't say he will "never" get an opportunity. I said it is highly unlikely, and was referring only to the Cincy position.
5. How do you know that teams weren't calling about Mccarron ?....I suppose I should have guessed that 'Shake n Blake' from Bengals message board was an NFL insider with the scoop on everything.
6. I've already stated my case on those games and clearly Andy Dalton needed and got a great deal of support in reaching those 10 wins. A handful of cupcakes on the schedule didn't hurt either.
1. You're right, it could, so this is my last post on it. You're not really addressing my points anyway.
2. I figured you wouldn't have much to say on that post, considering it highlighted many of Dalton's accomplishments.
3. Dalton's contract has very little guaranteed money and the Bengals could dump him right now with very little problem. So there goes that argument. Although facts seem to have little to no effect on you or your theories.
4. You're insinuating that he's a superior prospect by saying that he could quickly and easily surpass Dalton's current level. These are your words, not mine. Own them. Now if McCarron is a superior prospect - or could be - then multiple teams would be offering multiple high draft picks. You don't think the Bengals would trade Mac for multiple good picks? Heck, the most stubborn man on the planet gave in for a 1st and a 2nd with Palmer. You don't think he'd give up McCarron for something similar or even close to? Fwiw, I fully expect you to avoid this question. Again.
5. It's called the internet. For example, when the Broncos were interested in Kaepernick and Sanchez, it was all over the place. There wasn't even a hint of a rumor that any team had any interest at all in McCarron. It's not ironclad proof that no teams were interested, but you would think there would be a leak if some team sniffed around. Either from someone around the Bengals or from the team that was interested. And a dozen or so teams should be interested if McCarron is as good as you claim he could be. That's a lot of teams keeping it close to the vest...or very little interest. Take your pick.
6. Funny you knock Dalton for "beating cupcakes" in 2014 when McCarron's 2 career victories came against 5-11 teams. Nevermind the wins against the Broncos, Texans and Ravens (twice). Or all of Dalton's other career wins against great teams.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
