06-27-2015, 07:15 PM
(06-27-2015, 06:19 PM)Brownshoe Wrote: Lol Wilson rarely has any kind of production. And your insane if you think that Dalton still had better weapons if you include injuries. Wilson is a game manager 100% him only having five 300+ games in his career including the playoffs. Wilson isn't even in the top 10 QBs. Romo, Rivers, Ryan, and even people like Newton (who I don't even think is in the top 10) is better than Wilson. Dalton has been a big reason why our offense has even been relevant. We haven't had a good run game other than the last half of last year. Dalton has only had above average weapons ONE year, and he had stats that Wilson will NEVER have.
Without a team like the Seahawks Wilson would be considered an average QB
So, Andy is a good QB because he can only put up volume numbers after being surrounded by a good team. Wilson is overrated (lol) because he's surrounded by a good team? Uhhh...okay.
Every fact points to RW being much better than Dalton, yet you're going to tell the guy posting real facts that he needs to provide "proof" (he already has multiple times) when you're the one that is basing your entire argument on some hypothetical situation where RW is in a different system. What?! Hahahahahaha this is honestly just funny more than anything. "Hey buddy, you better provide even more facts if you want to go up against my insane, biased, conjecture based opinions!!!"
Oh, it's Brownshoe in an Andy debate, nevermind. **** logic and unbiased reasoning.
It's not a slight on Andy to admit that RW is a very good NFL QB and is one of the best in the league for the scheme in place in Seattle. RW is really good. Andy is....somewhere between bad and good. Meh, deal with it.
