So It's NOT Just Bengal Bias!!

[wolfkaosaun]

(07-26-2016, 01:19 PM)Bengalsrob Wrote: Brady gets four games for throwing an under inflated football, Burfict four for playing too rough, everybody short of Obama rallied to try and convince the world Shazier's hit was not dirty, he gets an attaboy. Yes, there's bias, always has been; and anybody who's a Bengals, Ravens, or Browns fan who doesn't see it isn't a fan of their teams, but one of miliions of the closet Steeler fans out there.

Burfict has done dirty plays before. He's been a part of numerous hard hits and penalties. It's not like he's a one time offender. I mean, there's videos of him getting away with twisting ankles and the cheap hit on the Ravens TE.

Shazier's hit was just as dirty as Burfict's. Both were in the moment and really big hits. The NFL changed the rule to the Shazier hit, but EVERYONE basically agreed that the hit should have been a penalty.

Bryant is suspended for a whole year. Bell is suspended for 4 games. Ben has been suspended numerous times. So has Harrison.

The only difference is the Steelers don't get dogged on like the Bengals did in 05. But, to be fair, that team was just an overall time bomb that attracted media to it.