08-03-2016, 11:44 PM
(08-03-2016, 09:34 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Oh, I though we were using stats. But I see we most consider their "success rate" and other interpreted stats that use formulas to obtain rankings.
This is fun.
What is fun about being proven wrong?
If you really think interceptions are the best way to judge a CB you have no clue what you are talking about. Patrick Peterson only had 2 ints last year. There were 22 CBs that had more than Peterson. Do you really think Patrick peterson is not even one of the top 20 CBS in the league?
