08-04-2016, 04:01 AM
(08-02-2016, 04:34 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: I disagree with this and support Brad's selection of a RB before a run on WRs. If he can get solid RB talent in round 1, he should. After that, go 4 receivers, as you said.
Agreed on waiting for a QB. Unless you have one of the top 3, the difference is negligible in the long run.
Ditto. Always get the best RB available first (unless you pick really late and a WR is noticeably better) then load up on WR and take a QB later (there's always someone left late). If you're picking really late and miss out on a decent RB, you're high on the waiver list and get good dibbs on an "unknown" breakout RB.
And the #1 rule above all others...take a K LAST. Very last.
![Cool Cool](http://i.imgur.com/8AWxq9g.gif)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."