08-04-2016, 11:25 PM
(08-04-2016, 11:15 PM)bfine32 Wrote: One person has harped on INTs in this thread and that is you. Why do you make up something that someone has said and then try to point out how silly it is? You praised a site because they used stats, so I suggested we use stats.
You praised a site for using stats, yet they put Dre in the top 20 because they do this:
(perhaps just a tad more complicated than taking yards and dividing by carries to obtain YPC, but you knew this, you're just trying real hard)
Yep, this is legit analysis; yet PFF (a sight that over 1/2/the NFL teams pay a premium to access) is faulty.
Why, because Fred says so and anyone that disagrees doesn't understand statistical analysis.
F.O. lists Dre as a mediocre starting CB, because for some warped reason they give him added points for not playing the slot. Roll with that if you want. There's one dude in this thread that is buying it.
Notice how he hand-waved PFF without explaining why this study was better. He only said "superior stats".
We have data analyctics changing the game of football with PFF leading the way, but they're all wrong.
Because Fred...
