08-04-2016, 11:59 PM
(08-04-2016, 11:52 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Check out post 61 and see if you can crack the code:
If you would have taken a little more time reading and a little less time looking silly, you would have caught that.
Are you saying Dre and Claiborne are so separated by those stats that one can be call ed a bust and another can be called a top 20 CB in the NFL?
This getting silly.
So you don't want to just use ints? you wnat to use PDs, FF and FR.
Okay lets ACTUALLY LOOK AT THESE STATS instead of just crying about how I refuse to look at them.
Last year Patrick Peterson had 8 PD, 1 FF, 1 FR. (according to profootball reference)
Dre had 16 PD, 0 FF, and 0 FR.
So let's talk about all these amazing stats you rely on to determine who is the best CB. I am all ears. Because it looks like Dre was a much better CB than Peterson last year based on these stats. Don't you agree?
