Finally getting some legitimate analysis of Kirkpatrick's play in '15

[*bfine32*]

(08-04-2016, 11:59 PM)fredtoast Wrote: This getting silly.

So you don't want to just use ints?  you wnat to use PDs, FF and FR.

Okay lets ACTUALLY LOOK AT THESE STATS instead of just crying about how I refuse to look at them.

Last year Patrick Peterson had 8 PD, 1 FF, 1 FR. (according to profootball reference)

Dre had 16 PD, 0 FF, and 0 FR.


So let's talk about all these amazing stats you rely on to determine who is the best CB.  I am all ears.  Because it looks like Dre was a much better CB than Peterson last year based on these stats.  Don't you agree?

Oh, it got silly a long time ago; it's just harder to see when you are the cause. I simply said Dre and Claiborne had similar stats and no one has said you refuse to look at them. All along I've been applauding you desire to use stats to determine what is legit. Do you think F.O. used these stats you provided to determine their rankings? Because they are legit for using stats.