08-11-2016, 09:19 PM
(08-11-2016, 04:53 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: Completely difference scenarios.
However, since you're a military man and want to use a military analogy, we will: when you were in training, specifically for an operation or something, were you allowed to talk back to your superior officer in the heat of the drill because "it wasn't the real thing"?
The point is, as I pointed out, he wouldn't need the advantages that the PED provides.
And that means that Steelers fans support a rapist and learn to debate means learn to engage in a debate.
No, because, like I said, it's the fact that Brown is a d bag that should have been kicked out of practice and just is an arrogant prick with no respect.
Let me ask you this: Had the ref had the authority and had Brown been kicked out of practice, what would it have changed in the overall picture? Would it change the degree in which Brown is an arrogant, d bag of a child? If so, how?
Also, it was more like a scrimmage with an NFL ref, so is a scrimmage enough like a real game to make it wrong for Brown to do?
In this instance, it was a joint practice and was in the time of practice that was more like a scrimmage. Do you consider a scrimmage to be a real game?
As I say above, it's not about him being kicked out, it's about the fact that he should have been because he's a whiny little ***** that thinks he's better than everyone.
You think Brown knew that he couldn't be kicked out? It's about intent and actions of classless punks.
Your military reference is flawed. If a soldier talked back to his superior during a "practice", you better believe that he would not be kicked out of that practice. He would turn into the main focus of it. Nice try.