I think Marvin's approach to timeouts is misunderstood by most

[treee]

I know I will get a lot of backlash for this, but Marvin's approach to timeouts, in my opinion, is totally valid. Using timeouts as a way to stretch the potential of a come back at the end of a half is conventional, but it can also be used to ensure cohesiveness at critical moments.

Though some argue that the moments Marvin chooses to call timeouts are not proper, I would argue that there is no way they can make that claim without specifically knowing the game plan, and the players' understanding of said game plan.

Feel free to use this thread as a discussion about Marvin's use of timeouts as well as your opinion on the various approaches in general to time out usage.