Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
I think Marvin's approach to timeouts is misunderstood by most
#14
(08-17-2016, 08:52 PM)treee Wrote: Perhaps I didn't articulate my main point well enough because people are really latching on to the "unreadiness" aspect. I think most of the time Marvin uses the seemingly random timeouts strategicly, probably because someone up in the booth notices something.

Idk. If that's the way you want to explain the TO's then I'd have a couple questions.

1. What are these people in the booth noticing that would force a TO?
2. If they don't like the play call for the defensive alignment, why not audible instead?

Either way, it really does seem like we're more prone to burn TO's. So are we just seeing things we don't like more often than other teams? Seems like something could be done to preserve those 2nd half TO's. They can be pretty important in close games.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: I think Marvin's approach to timeouts is misunderstood by most - Shake n Blake - 08-17-2016, 09:11 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)