08-20-2016, 12:06 AM
(08-19-2016, 10:51 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Whatever Nate. You know rookies struggle to earn time under Marv. If LaFell only misses a game or two and Boyd is impressive enough to keep the starting gig, I don't see how that could be viewed as anything but positive. It would mean Boyd is balling out.
I'm not saying LaFell missing the entire season would be a positive or anything silly like that. I like what I see in Boyd though. I guess you think the season is down the tubes, but you don't see any positives right now? Particularly with Boyd so far?
Hey mellow oot! I was being mostly facetious. If you recall, I wasn't convinced Lafell was anything but a cheap-arse bandaid for our loss or 2 WRs. I'm also critical of Marvin, so the notion that we have to enjoy the crappy veterans breaking down so the young guys get a shot fits my narrative, too.