Le'veon Bell's suspension

[*TheLeonardLeap*]

(08-20-2016, 03:38 PM)fredtoast Wrote: I don't even understand what you are trying to say now.

Are you really trying to argue that the NFL should NEVER be allowed to investigate ANY player for ANY reason?

That is the only conclusion I can draw from this gibberish.  So if I am wrong please explain exactly what you mean.

Fred, when aren't you wrong? We all know you just prefer arguing with people. People post reasonable things on this site all the time and you intentionally just take it to the obtuse extreme every time.

"Oh, people are arguing that Nugent is a low tier kicker? I better pretend they're saying he's the worst."
"Oh, people are saying Nugent hasn't been good for 4 years and 1 preseason? I better compare it to Giovani Bernard's week 2 preseason game."
"Oh, people don't think Kirkpatrick is a good first round pick, or a good #2 CB? I better say they're calling him the worst CB in the league, and then call him the 16th or 17th best just to be a turd."
"Oh, someone said that Al Jazeera "news" and a recanted testimony isn't legitimate proof because neither are trustworthy? I better say that they actually mean nobody can ever be investigated for any reason ever."

Sure it's nice to have a foil every now and then on this forum, but it just wears thin real quickly when it's 24/7. Go back under your bridge and prepare a riddle for someone who wants to cross it.