08-20-2016, 06:40 PM
(08-20-2016, 12:22 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Personally i think every small shred of evidence justifies an investigation. I agree that players should not be suspended without good evidence, but I think they have to comply with almost any investigation to determine if there is any good evidence.
If they have actual evidence. Doesn't seem the players have seen it. If that "evidence" is just the article then they shouldn't be compelled to interview. The union won't, and shouldn't, allow an interview to be the foundation of "evidence" and the basis for disciplinary action.
IMO, this is either a fishing expedition or for appearances, or both.
--------------------------------------------------------
