Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
No more AJM to Vikings talk
#22
(09-03-2016, 12:44 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: McCarron is under contract for two more years, both '16 and '17. Both significantly cheaper than Bradford. If anything, if McCarron played well for the Vikings and Bridgewater comes back 100% for '17, then they could retrade McCarron and recoup their value. Possibly get more depending on how well he played.

Hopefully we don't find out later the Bengals were offered ridiculous amounts and refused to talk to anyone. It'd be Akili Smith/Ricky Williams all over again.

I was making the point that if McCarron was traded NEXT year, and played well, he would be due the large dollar amount.  That was why I said next year. 

There is no way I would trade McCarron this year. 
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
No more AJM to Vikings talk - pally - 09-03-2016, 11:50 AM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - SHRacerX - 09-03-2016, 11:53 AM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - SHRacerX - 09-03-2016, 12:36 PM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - SHRacerX - 09-03-2016, 05:42 PM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - SHRacerX - 09-03-2016, 05:44 PM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - Goalpost - 09-03-2016, 12:24 PM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - Benton - 09-03-2016, 05:49 PM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - Beaker - 09-03-2016, 12:47 PM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - SHRacerX - 09-04-2016, 10:22 AM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - Go Cards - 09-04-2016, 01:25 AM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - Go Cards - 09-04-2016, 01:30 PM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - Go Cards - 09-04-2016, 01:17 AM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - Jpoore - 09-04-2016, 02:39 AM
RE: No more AJM to Vikings talk - Go Cards - 09-05-2016, 01:20 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)