09-05-2016, 01:14 PM
(09-04-2016, 10:12 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Yeah, but then like one day later Mark Sanchez got released. Would you rather have Sam Bradford for 6-10 games (before getting hurt) or Mark Sanchez, a 1st round pick, and a 4th round pick?
Fair question and I have to wonder if the Vikings are kicking themselves. Like I said in a different thread though, Bradford has a very low 2.27 INT% for his career. Sanchez is at 3.75, which is higher than average. For a team that's planning on running AP and protecting the football, I'd say Bradford was a better choice. Sanchez for free still sounds enticing compared to what they gave up for Bradford though.
Tough call. That's assuming Sanchez was in play for them though.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
