Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why is Driskel NOT on the PS?
#3
It would be a dick move to claim him, not pay him, waive him and then expect him to sign to the PS. He'll at least get a week of 53 man roster pay. That's basically just a way to bully him into the PS without giving him the opportunity to look at other teams.

I know you have to keep a player you sign from an opponent's PS on the roster for a few weeks. I don't know if there are any rules regarding players claimed off waivers but it would make sense for something to be in place so teams don't abuse it (claim players you don't intend to keep just to screw opponents, claim players just to cut them without paying them etc.)

We'd also need to have someone we want to fill the spot with immediately, I think we are waiting until after week 1 to pick up a vet. Whoever takes Driskel's place obviously won't be active on Sunday.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Why is Driskel NOT on the PS? - EatonFan - 09-07-2016, 11:08 PM
RE: Why is Driskel NOT on the PS? - Nizoj - 09-07-2016, 11:28 PM
RE: Why is Driskel NOT on the PS? - Jpoore - 09-09-2016, 02:17 AM
RE: Why is Driskel NOT on the PS? - Jpoore - 09-08-2016, 04:24 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)