Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why is Driskel NOT on the PS?
#21
(09-09-2016, 01:43 AM)BengalChris Wrote: We aren't trading AJM to the Browns or anyone else during the season. And we don't trade within the division hardly ever. The Bengals front office has seen what has happened in Dallas and Minnesota and they know a good backup QB is something they want on the team.

Driskel was picked up so that the team to see if he might be able to replace AJM next year.

Exactly nobody with any sense should trade him this year. But mb should talk to him and either if hes happy being a backup resign him which is 0.1% chance or trade him in the offseason.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Why is Driskel NOT on the PS? - EatonFan - 09-07-2016, 11:08 PM
RE: Why is Driskel NOT on the PS? - Nizoj - 09-07-2016, 11:28 PM
RE: Why is Driskel NOT on the PS? - Jpoore - 09-09-2016, 02:17 AM
RE: Why is Driskel NOT on the PS? - Jpoore - 09-08-2016, 04:24 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)