09-13-2016, 03:51 AM
(09-13-2016, 03:43 AM)Brownshoe Wrote: He wouldn't have to fight with the defender if he was faster. The defender was on his ass and that's why he did that. The ball was in a place where the defender couldn't get it and where LaFell didn't have to break stride and easily catch it. The ball wasn't underthrown, and LaFell didn't break stride.
He was faster than the defender. That is why he was behind him. Double moves can get you past faster DBs but this is 49 yards down field we are talking about here. He was just straight up faster. All I am saying is that if the ball was even just a yard or two further, he could have caught it without having to turn his hips and he very well could have taken it to the house. I wouldn't go so far as to say the ball was underthrown, Brownshoe. I was just saying that Andy has more potential that he can build on. Listen, we both love the Bengals and we both want them to win. Obviously we aren't going to agree here so I say we just lay it to rest and move on. I'm sorry for being a jerk but I love football and I consider myself a student of the game and when you told me I didn't know what I was talking about I took offense. I need to get some sleep. Later dude.