Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What should she be charged with?
#23
(07-08-2015, 01:46 PM)djs7685 Wrote: It's not an accident when you hit a stationary object with a moving vehicle.

If you're operating a vehicle, pay attention. If you aren't paying attention for ANY reason, then it's 100% your fault and you should face the consequences of anything that happens as a result of your dumbass-ness.

If she wasn't reacting quick enough to stop in time, it's her fault. If you have "bad depth perception" then you shouldn't be allowed to operate a machine that weighs thousands of pounds capable of reaching high speeds.

This is pretty cut and dry. You don't hit a non-moving object if you're paying attention and are mentally capable of driving a car. Unless she hit a patch of ice in July, there's no legitimate excuse for this.

I don't know that it was a non-moving vehicle that she just came upon and ran over.  In that area at that time it's more like slow traffic that came to a stop, and he stopped quicker than she.

And personally I will maintain that driving a motorcycle involves an assumed risk higher than that of a person in a car.  An everyday ordinary occurence  can be fatal.  I think it would be cool to ride a motorcycle, but I never have because what can be an inconvenience in a car can kill you on a bike.  If a fender bender can land me in prison, then I'd just as soon ban motorcycles.
You can go to live in France, but you cannot become a Frenchman. You can go to live in Germany or Turkey or Japan, but you cannot become a German, a Turk, or a Japanese. But anyone, from any corner of the Earth, can come to live in America and become an American

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: What should she be charged with? - michaelsean - 07-08-2015, 01:58 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)