09-18-2016, 06:10 PM
(09-18-2016, 05:56 PM)treee Wrote: I disagree. You couldn't see the ball enough to overturn whatever the call was. I guarantee you if it was ruled down by contact on the field and then they reviewed it that would have been upheld as well. You just couldn't see the ball well enough to make any determinations. They had no choice but to go with the call on the field. What you should actually be pissed about is that they called it a fumble on the field.
I disagree with your disagreement.
![Mellow Mellow](http://www.planetsmilies.com/smilies/indifferent/indifferent0012.gif)
Harrison hitting Boyd's arm is what caused the "fumble". Boyd's knee was down before Harrison's hit, so...
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.