Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Blandino defends ruling on Boyd fumble
#31
Based on his explanation, if the initial ruling had been a catch -- that also would have been upheld due to lack of proof otherwise. This goes back a few years ago where basically when there's a fumble/interception/touchdown, the default is to call it that and let the play play out as opposed to blowing a whistle, figuring replay will validate the call or overturn it.
Beat writer for Cincinnati.com & The Enquirer. Follow along on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and Periscope.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Blandino defends ruling on Boyd fumble - jowczarski - 09-19-2016, 02:10 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)