09-19-2016, 05:30 PM
(09-19-2016, 05:28 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Well intended idea, but a false interpretation of the existing rule...Perhaps, but it seems as though once the call is "fumble" - now they are FORCED to prove NO FUMBLE.
My suggestion is to always make them PROVE WHAT DID HAPPEN, not what didn't - REGARDLESS of the call on the field.
Take away the burden of "overturning" a call - and focus on GETTING IT RIGHT.