AFC North Defenses: 2015

[BmorePat87]

(07-09-2015, 12:23 AM)BFritz21 Wrote: First off, I may have been exaggerating, but, like I said, when he breaks away from the defense, a 60+ yarder is the same as an 80 yard run........  lol......  how is that hard to understand?!  How does this guy teach high school kids?!  You think, if that 280+ pound lineman had 15 extra yards, he could have caught Hill?

Please explain that to me.

Then say what you mean. You can't get upset because I respond to exactly what you say. There's a big difference between 60 and 80. Either way, 3 times isn't a lot.

Also, trying to insult my profession when I respond to exactly what you say makes you look like a clown.

Quote:Of all of those big runs, Forsett only had ONE touchdown, right?  That ONE touchdown was only from 20 YARDS, so please explain how that shows his big play ability related to Hill's?

17 > 8. Forsett led the league in big runs. If you want to argue "big touchdown runs" then that's fine. If we're just discussing big runs, he was the best.

Quote:I was pointing out how Hill can break long runs and can't be caught, so Forsett is kind of irrelevant, right?  I guess it's my fault for expecting a high school teacher to understand the relationship, or lack thereof, in breakaway runs compared to runs of 20 yards (and even longer, even though they didn't result in touchdowns).

You were discussing how if he runs the ball 10 times, he will break off an 80 yard run. That happened once when he ran 20+ times. I guess it's your fault for expecting someone to read what you say.

Quote:lol  What is wrong with this guy?

You misspoke and that's fine. Next time say "Ok, I was exaggerating, but the point I was trying to make was that he had 3 really good 60+ yard runs last season, 2 of which were touchdowns. He has great speed and can't be caught once he breaks one off. If they're not careful, he's going to catch them off guard."

You're wondering why people take me more seriously than you and call you immature. This is a great example. Because instead of saying this your response was to act like I am dumb for not realizing that when you wrote "80" you really meant "60". Hopefully you understand this and can make a change. I'm really trying to be nice here but you're making it hard.