10-06-2016, 09:50 PM
(10-06-2016, 03:50 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Which coach is worse, one that goes 0-1 in postseason or one that goes 0-7?
He was talking about the postseason.
Which regular season coach is better? One that goes 1-0 or the one that's 7-0?
(10-06-2016, 07:52 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Of the 32 HC in the NFL...
-8 haven't been a HC for even 2 full seasons yet.
Of those remaining 24...
-7 have won a Super Bowl.
Of those remaining 17...
-3 have been to a Super Bowl.
That leaves Marv in a pool of 14 HC who have coached at least 2 full seasons in their career, but haven't won a SB. Mediocre Marv will forever be Mediocre Marv.
A few years ago - in response to a similar claim by Fred - I made up a grading system for season success and compared Marvin's Bengals tenure to the rest of the NFL from 2003 to 2013 (?). The grading system went like this:
+8 for 12+ wins
+5 for 10-11 wins
+3 for 9 wins
0 for 8-8
-3 for 7 wins
-5 for 5-6 wins
-8 for 4 wins or less
+10 pts for division title
+10 for each playoff win
+50 for a Super Bowl title
Marvin's "success" ranked 20th compared to the rest of the league during that time frame. I still plan on updating that list at some point. It was a crap ton of work though, and all Marv apologists did was criticize the grading system anyway.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.