10-10-2016, 02:36 PM
(10-10-2016, 12:49 PM)fredtoast Wrote: No it was not clear at all.
If it was that cut and dried then Marvin would be getting long contract extensions instead of just one year at a time.
Fred,
It has been well reported over the years that Marvin is the one not going for long term deals. Similar to LeBron holding Cleveland over a barrel. Stop interpreting that to mean Mike Brown is some sort of contract savant. Marvin is holding management by the balls (smart in his part) not the other way around. They love him there.
Also, to address your saying I fail at logic a few pages back... YOU literally brought up the Pats and their record against bad teams in one paragraph and then in the same paragraphed brought up the Bengals being allowed to do the same. That is called a comparison. For you to come back and tell me you weren't comparing is moronic. You clearly were and then decided you weren't after I pointed out how stupid that would be. I'm not some backwoods mouth breather from whatever part of TN or WV you reside. Please HD yourself accountable for all of the lead paint chips you ate as a kid that make you try and double back in stuff you say or don't post dumb shit.
I swear, man, sometimes I think you sniff glue before you log on.
