10-18-2016, 09:36 AM
People always use children's logic to defend Burfict' "well he did it too" or "did you see what he did". It doesn't work that way. Burfict put the target on his back. He seems to enjoy being the villain, but wants to also be the victim.
I have no problem with him being an enforcer. I love the fire and intensity he brings to the D. I hate that he still won't get it through his thick skull that all eyes are on him. He needs to play more disciplined. He has to make smarter decisions. That doesn't mean he can't play tough, but have some self control. He cannot help the team if he cannot be on the field.
I don't care how talented he is, if he can't stay on the field what good is he really doing? I'm not saying get rid of Burfict. I am asking people to step back and look at this objectively. Is it better to have him 10 games or 16? He has all of the talent it takes to be a true great, but he limits himself by always being in the middle of ignorant shit.
I have no problem with him being an enforcer. I love the fire and intensity he brings to the D. I hate that he still won't get it through his thick skull that all eyes are on him. He needs to play more disciplined. He has to make smarter decisions. That doesn't mean he can't play tough, but have some self control. He cannot help the team if he cannot be on the field.
I don't care how talented he is, if he can't stay on the field what good is he really doing? I'm not saying get rid of Burfict. I am asking people to step back and look at this objectively. Is it better to have him 10 games or 16? He has all of the talent it takes to be a true great, but he limits himself by always being in the middle of ignorant shit.