Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Actually, it may be Zampeze
#12
(10-30-2016, 11:16 PM)psychdoctor Wrote: It's not Zampeze.  It's the chemistry of the OL and the RT position.  It is a suspect Line-backer personnel.   It is poor, very poor tackling.  It is a kicker who should have been gone for a while.  I do think, however, that the offense is not playing in rhythm and maybe no huddle or hurry up offensive plays may help.  

Chemistry of the O-Line? There's just 1 new starter.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Actually, it may be Zampeze - SunsetBengal - 10-30-2016, 09:46 PM
RE: Actually, it may be Zampeze - samhain - 10-30-2016, 09:52 PM
RE: Actually, it may be Zampeze - TKUHL - 10-30-2016, 10:20 PM
RE: Actually, it may be Zampeze - Sled21 - 11-01-2016, 08:58 AM
RE: Actually, it may be Zampeze - Pat5775 - 11-01-2016, 06:50 PM
RE: Actually, it may be Zampeze - Go Cards - 10-30-2016, 10:34 PM
RE: Actually, it may be Zampeze - SHRacerX - 11-02-2016, 08:49 AM
RE: Actually, it may be Zampeze - Go Cards - 10-30-2016, 10:57 PM
RE: Actually, it may be Zampeze - THE PISTONS - 10-30-2016, 11:31 PM
RE: Actually, it may be Zampeze - Joelist - 11-01-2016, 06:39 PM
RE: Actually, it may be Zampeze - Joelist - 11-02-2016, 01:42 AM
RE: Actually, it may be Zampeze - SHRacerX - 11-02-2016, 08:56 AM
RE: Actually, it may be Zampeze - SHRacerX - 11-02-2016, 09:02 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)