11-01-2016, 12:45 AM
(11-01-2016, 12:24 AM)bfine32 Wrote: As I said a few posts back, IMO when they shut down that offense on the first drive of OT, they did their job.
Now a question for you: Do you feel the Skin's D did their job in OT?
So, even if they allowed the game winning FG, they did their job? I guess we'll just agree to disagree on that.
As for the Redskins D in OT...they forced a punt on the Bengals first drive and the Bengals fumbled on the 2nd. They didn't allow the Bengals to get into FG position on either drive. Each side helped the other (missed FG, fumble)...but, I would say the Redskins did their job because because the Bengals couldn't get any farther than the Redskins 40 (ending at the 48).
You can say that neither team allowed any points and you'd be correct. However, one allowed a game winning FG attempt, while the other didn't. That's not my opinion, that's the way it went down.