11-19-2016, 10:22 PM
(11-19-2016, 09:48 PM)xxlt Wrote: Well, thank goodness UCLA didn't take that approach with coach Wooden.
Maybe 21 years in one place means that every person who has been a HC has thought, yeah, this guy knows what he is doing and we would be hard pressed to find someone better, so let's not give the job to someone less competent just for the sake of change.
Wooden's longevity was a result of being one of the very best coaches in sports history. Not sure how that has any relevance in a discussion about Paul Alexander's longevity with the Bengals.
To your point of 'we would be hard pressed to find someone better' - if that's the case then they might as well just give him a lifetime deal and be done with it, correct? Same goes for Marvin. Why ever look to improve on or become better than you currently are/have been?
