11-20-2016, 12:22 AM
(11-19-2016, 11:57 PM)fredtoast Wrote: No, not correct at all.
What it means is that PA has been doing a good job for a long time. That is why he has not been replaced. When someone is doing a good job y9u don't just say "Get rid of him just because he has been here a long time."
As I stated, if the reasoning behind not making a change is 'we would be hard pressed to find someone better' then why ever make a change? Just give him a deal that allows him to coach as long as he wants.
His unit is terrible this year...but I'm assuming that you don't think he should be replaced because, in your estimation, he's been doing a good job for a long time'?
I'm curious, would there ever be a time when he could be replaced? Give me a scenario where you think Paul could/should be replaced.
