11-20-2016, 12:34 AM
(11-20-2016, 12:22 AM)Bengalholic Wrote: As I stated, if the reasoning behind not making a change is 'we would be hard pressed to find someone better' then why ever make a change? Just give him a deal that allows him to coach as long as he wants.
His unit is terrible this year...but I'm assuming that you don't think he should be replaced because, in your estimation, he's been doing a good job for a long time'?
I'm curious, would there ever be a time when he could be replaced? Give me a scenario where you think Paul could/should be replaced.
Now you are trying to change the argument.
You originally tries to argue that the only reason to get rid of him was because he has been around a long time. Your sais your biggest problem was not how the line was playing this year, but instead it was the fact that Paul had been here so long. And that is not a good reason to replace anyone.
