11-20-2016, 12:45 AM
(11-20-2016, 12:34 AM)fredtoast Wrote: Now you are trying to change the argument.
You originally tries to argue that the only reason to get rid of him was because he has been around a long time. Your sais your biggest problem was not how the line was playing this year, but instead it was the fact that Paul had been here so long. And that is not a good reason to replace anyone.
I never argued the 'only reason' to replace him was because he's been around a long time. That's simply dishonest on your part. Here's what I did say:
(11-19-2016, 01:31 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: My biggest problem with Paul Alexander is that he started coaching the O-line when I was 25 years old. I'm now 46!
I went on to explain what I mean:
(11-19-2016, 01:31 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: He's been here for a long, long time. Much like Marvin, I think that amount of time in one place can lead to your message or coaching techniques becoming stale and not being as effective.
I also said:
(11-19-2016, 01:31 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: I've never thought he was a great coach, but never thought he was terrible either. I just think it's time for some new blood. I don't put all the blame on him for this year's struggles, but he deserves a fair share of the criticism.
Take the time to read the entire post next time.
I'll ask again, would there ever be a scenario where you would support replacing Alexander?
