Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Peerman gets activated not WJ3
#30
(11-23-2016, 01:56 PM)fredtoast Wrote: T think you are missing the big point.

here is the post you should be replying to.




Rep to Sled for understanding the situation.

I understand perfectly, that there's no difference in handing the ball off to Peerman or Hewitt, because they both aren't good at being actual running backs. I don't see the relevance on bringing back Peerman, just to have a 3rd running back on the roster, when technically we already have a 3rd running back in the Hback.
[Image: s4ed9rgnqb251.jpg]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - TKUHL - 11-24-2016, 12:31 AM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-23-2016, 01:58 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-23-2016, 02:14 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-23-2016, 02:25 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-23-2016, 02:38 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-24-2016, 07:50 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - TKUHL - 11-24-2016, 12:59 AM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-23-2016, 04:10 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - snowy - 11-23-2016, 01:48 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - yellowxdiscipline - 11-23-2016, 02:03 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - TKUHL - 11-24-2016, 12:47 AM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - TKUHL - 11-24-2016, 01:19 AM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-24-2016, 07:54 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - treee - 11-28-2016, 09:18 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)