Cincinnati Bengals Message Board / Forums - Home of Jungle Noise › Cincinnati Bengals / NFL › JUNGLE NOISE v
Should LaFell be re-signed?
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Should LaFell be re-signed?
Bengal Dude Offline
That one guy
*

Administrators
Posts: 5,609
Threads: 36
Reputation: 36341
Joined: May 2015
Location: Vancouver, WA

#39
12-21-2016, 05:26 PM
I'd see what's available on the market, but I'm guessing we'll hang onto LaFell. Sign him to a 2 year deal with all of the guaranteed money in year 1. If Boyd/Core/Other show themselves as a capable #2, then you can release him in year 2.
You can always trust an dishonest man to be dishonest. Honestly, it's the honest ones you have to look out for.
"Winning makes believers of us all"-Paul Brown
Find
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Should LaFell be re-signed? - Bengalholic - 12-20-2016, 04:33 PM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - Au165 - 12-20-2016, 05:27 PM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - bfine32 - 12-20-2016, 05:30 PM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - corpjet - 12-20-2016, 05:43 PM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - Benton - 12-20-2016, 05:43 PM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - SHRacerX - 12-21-2016, 09:40 AM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - Sled21 - 12-20-2016, 06:56 PM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - kevin - 12-20-2016, 07:33 PM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - kevin - 12-21-2016, 09:06 AM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - PlayadLc - 12-21-2016, 01:59 AM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - treee - 12-21-2016, 02:58 AM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - Crowe - 12-21-2016, 09:25 AM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - SHRacerX - 12-21-2016, 09:38 AM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - kevin - 12-21-2016, 10:08 AM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - R3stangs - 12-21-2016, 12:21 PM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - Bengal Dude - 12-21-2016, 05:26 PM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - samhain - 12-22-2016, 09:14 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)