01-21-2017, 08:28 PM
(01-21-2017, 04:01 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Yeah, Foster is an exciting player, i get why people like the guy and i would be fine with the pick.
I was just hoping for a LB that was great in coverage. But this could be correctable with Foster so hey, i am for it.
I guess saying Foster is BAD in coverage is an overstatement by me for sure.
But losing his receivers is pretty much the definition of getting lost. Locking eyes with the QB is good at times but
can also be a weakness if done too often, especially in the NFL. Foster will have to work on this.
Gotcha. That whole exchange came off way more aggro than I was actually feeling. Sorry, man.
I like Foster at 9 for his relentlessness, instincts and play making ability. However, Cunningham offers nearly as much as Foster but is better in coverage, from what I have read and seen.
Fueled by satanism, violence, and sodomy, dinosaurs had little chance to survive as a species.
