01-25-2017, 11:53 PM
(01-25-2017, 11:27 PM)grampahol Wrote: Since when was quantity of scouts better than quality of scouts ? They could have 1000 scouts and it means nothing if they don't know how to evaluate.
I'm not saying Bengals scouts are all that and a bag of chips, but having 10 or even 20 more doesn't automatically make them great at anything. It does mean there's more.
I get what you're saying, but still. When we have 3 or 4 full time scouts and list another 5 or 6 from the scout pool that aren't really anything but making the numbers look better ?
Other teams have double, triple, or more the full time scouts we do. They can cover way more teams/area/players than we can - period.
In the end it's just another example of Mike Browns cheapness and thinking he can do it all himself.