Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Do the Bengals Stay Put or Trade Down?
#10
(02-20-2017, 11:23 AM)fredtoast Wrote: This makes no sense.  We don't need to give up a second round pick in order to get a 5th rounder when we are already projected to have 11 picks.

I'd have to look at the chart, but I'd say the Browns would have to give up that #18 pick in the second round (50th) to move up from 12 to 9 in the first.  That way we get an extra 2nd round pick instead of just moving up a few spots.

The chart said 150 value.  So basically you are saying the Bengals would keep their Second (41st pick) and get the browns 50th pick?  That would be great.

I don't think Mike Brown would do it given his history with the Browns, and like someone said earlier, giving the Browns a legitimate shot at a QB may not be prudent.. WTS, I would certainly benefit both teams. 
[Image: maXCb2f.jpg]
-Paul Brown
“When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less.”

My album "Dragon"
https://www.humbert-lardinois.com/


[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Do the Bengals Stay Put or Trade Down? - psychdoctor - 02-20-2017, 01:23 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)