02-20-2017, 01:23 PM
(02-20-2017, 11:23 AM)fredtoast Wrote: This makes no sense. We don't need to give up a second round pick in order to get a 5th rounder when we are already projected to have 11 picks.
I'd have to look at the chart, but I'd say the Browns would have to give up that #18 pick in the second round (50th) to move up from 12 to 9 in the first. That way we get an extra 2nd round pick instead of just moving up a few spots.
The chart said 150 value. So basically you are saying the Bengals would keep their Second (41st pick) and get the browns 50th pick? That would be great.
I don't think Mike Brown would do it given his history with the Browns, and like someone said earlier, giving the Browns a legitimate shot at a QB may not be prudent.. WTS, I would certainly benefit both teams.
-Paul Brown
“When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less.”
My album "Dragon"
https://www.humbert-lardinois.com/