02-28-2017, 03:28 PM
(02-28-2017, 02:37 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: You are comparing LaFell's stats over 16 games compared to Jones' stats of 15 games. So do you believe Jones' stats may have been better over the same 16 game stretch in the system he spent the previous 4 seasons?
At least the Bengals were able to rollover the money the didn't use to re-sign Jones so they cannot resign their FAs this year so they can roll it over to next season.
Availability is the best ability. If he isn't on the field it doesn't matter. Lafell was there and Jones wasn't, which has been his MO most his career. Even if he had played 16 the stats don't justify paying 4x for Jones over Lafell.
